At Riverlands: If you build it, they will come. With a bow to William Kinsella.

Tern Barge at Riverlands

Tern Barge at Riverlands

When I first started my work on the Mississippi River, I went up to Riverlands to listen to the people up there who know wetlands and birds. They defined the success of Riverlands as a bird sanctuary: “If you build it, they will come.” Congress ordered the Corps to replace “acre for acre” every bit of land flooded by the construction of Lock and Dam 26. The Corps built Riverlands. The birds came.

Tern Barge

Tern Barge

The day started beautifully and then turned grey, but I was already halfway to Riverlands, a sixty mile drive. I wanted to see the tern barge, a Corps of Engineer experiment to provide nesting places for Least Terns, an endangered bird.

Terns like their privacy and want to nest on open sand bars where they can see any and all predators that may attack their nests. Last spring and this spring, the sand bars on the Mississippi south of St. Louis have been mostly under water during the nesting season. The barge is an attempt to create a floating sand barge that rises and falls with the river. The engineers covered the barge with sand, added a few bits of drift wood, decoys, a call box, and cover for the chicks, if the terns came. The terns came.

“If you build it, they will come.”

The St. Louis District of the Army Corps of Engineers has been providing nesting place for terns for several years. Before they put out the barge at Riverlands, the bird sanctuary behind Lock and Dam 26 on the Upper Mississippi, they were creating side channels in sandy dikes field by notching the dikes to allow water to scour out a channel between the shore and the field. The terns nest on the sand bars, protecting from predators by the side channel, where they can find fish.

Dike field above the Jefferson Barracks Bridge between St. Louis County, Missouri and Monroe County, Illinois

Dike field above the Jefferson Barracks Bridge between St. Louis County, Missouri and Monroe County, Illinois

The Corps tried to scour a channel between the dike field and the Illinois shore at the Jefferson Barracks Dike Field, but found there were too many chemicals contaminating the river and abandoned the project.

The Ratio of the Atchafalaya to the Mississippi

The Mississippi at the Old River Control Structure

The Mississippi at the Old River Control Structure

The New Orleans District of the Corps of Engineers has initiated a study that would change the ratio of Mississippi water and sediment that could be diverted to the Atchafalaya River, which is the only functioning distributary of the Mississippi, that is a river that carries water from the big river to the Gulf of Mexico, particularly come floodtime.

Several months ago I wrote a history of the Old River Control Structure and the Flood of 1973 and about the need for Atchafalaya water and sediment for rebuilding wetlands in the Terrebonne Basin. Len Bahr at lacoastpost explains the role of the Atchafalaya in Corps’ thinking and in the future of Louisiana’s wetlands far better than I can

Bayou Lafourche at Donaldsonville, Louisiana

Bayou Lafourche at Donaldsonville, Louisiana

When Europeans settled Louisiana the Mississippi had several distributaries: Bayou Lafourche, Bayou Plaquemine, Bayou Manchac, and the Atchafalaya. As people settled along the bayous, we closed the distributaries at their heads to prevent flooding the new communities. Not long ago I wrote about efforts to divert freshwater and sediment along Bayou Lafourche to wetlands in the Barataria and Terrebonne Basins south of Donaldsonvile.

When the Corps of Engineers ran the Mississippi River levees clear to Venice, the engineers left the Atchafalaya open to carry of Mississippi floodwater and protect New Orleans from flooding. They turned the Atchafalaya into a floodway and bracketed the river between between levees between levees set seventeen miles apart.

By the 1950s it became clear that the Mississippi had become too long and too flat and was going to do its river thing: divert to the Atchafalaya and leave Baton Rouge high and dry without a deep draft Mississippi to service their ports, because the Mississippi south of the Atchafalaya would fill with silt.

When the Corps built Old River Control in the 1950s it rationed 30% of the Mississippi to the Atchafalaya through the structure. That ratio has not change in 50 years, even  though it has become clear in the last 50 years that Louisiana’s wetlands desperately needed the freshwater and sediment the Atchafalaya could carry to them.

The Atchafalaya, which is building land at its mouth, offers many possiblities for land building in other places. In 2006 the Lake Pontchartrain Basin Foundation and the Coalition to Restore Coastal Louisiana published the first issue of the Multiple Lines of Defense Strategy. In the assessment team’s response to the publication of Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast, configured in the wake of Katrina and Rita, the scientists suggested diverting the Atchafalaya through East Protection Levee and Lake Palourde and into the fresh marshes of the Penchant Basin in the northwestern region of the Terrebonne Basin. They even upped the ante, suggesting that all of the Atchafalaya be diverted to the Terrebonne Basin. Check out page 23 in the pdf report.

Fresh Marshes along Bayou Carencro in the Penchant Basin

Fresh Marshes along Bayou Carencro in the Penchant Basin

Finally, Keith Magill published an editorial in Houma Today last sunday about the choices Louisiana faces in light of the LSU report on rising sea levels and sinking land across the coast. To get a feel for what we will lose if we lose the Louisiana coast, go to Bayou Woman, where Wendy Wilson Billot, details life along the bayous of the Terrebonne Basin.

Fountain Bluff and Tower Rock and the Mississippi River

Fountain Bluff and Tower Rock in red

Fountain Bluff and Tower Rock in red

Before Illinoian ice sheet pushed south through Illinois, the Mississippi flowed along the eastern valley wall. The ice blocked the flow of the Mississippi between the eastern valley wall and Fountain Bluff.

Fountain Bluff at Gorham

Fountain Bluff at Gorham

The river eroded a new channel around the the west side of the bluff and along the western valley wall, leaving Fountain Bluff as a free-standing element, rising more than two hundred feet above the ancient channel. It’s named for the numerous springs that flow from it.

Where the Mississippi carved a new course into bedrock, it left behind a rocky channel that the Corps of Engineers cleared during the 1870s. The engineers left Tower Rock as  a free-standing element in the river, thinking that one day it might serve as the foundation for a bridge. The rock, protected from quarrying, is know as the  smallest national park in the country. If you dare, negotiate the currents that swirl between the rock and the eastern shore, and take a boat out to the rock for a picnic.

Tower Rock

Tower Rock on the West and Fountain Bluff on the East

When the river runs low, at 0.1 on the Chester, Illinois gage, it is possible to hike out to Tower Rock.

Tower Rock

Tower Rock

Early nineteenth century geologists ignored the “broad belt of low, wet bottom, five miles in width, and mostly covered with ponds of water, except in the very dryest portions of the season, and over which for countless ages rolled the mighty currents that formed the valley in which the turpid waters of the Mississippi new find their way to the gulf.”

Wetland between Fountain Bluff and the Eastern Valley Wall of the Mississippi River

Wetland between Fountain Bluff and the Eastern Valley Wall of the Mississippi River

“From the fact that the waters of the Mississippi are restricted to an area much less than its average width, at what is called the Grand Tower, and are hemmed by precipitous limestone bluffs on either side, the theory has been entertained that at a former period these limestone cliffs extended quite across the river, forming an immense fall which has be gradually cut away by the current of the river.” –Amos Henry Worthen


[i] Wiggers, Raymond, Geology Underfoot in Illinois, Missoula, Montana, Mountain Press Publishing Company, 1997,  233; McDonald, Timothy A., “Illinoian Glacial Boundary,” Esling, Steven P. and Blum, Michael D., eds., Quaternary Sections in Southern Illinois and Southeast Missouri, Midwest Friends of the Pleistocene, 42nd Annual Meeting, 19-21 May 1995, 2.4; McDonald, Timothy A., “Quaternary Geology around Fountain Bluff,” Esling, Steven P. and Blum, Michael D., eds., Quaternary Sections in Southern Illinois and Southeast Missouri, Midwest Friends of the Pleistocene, 42nd Annual Meeting, 19-21 May 1995, 5.14; Hajic, Edwin R., Personal communication, July, 1999; Worthen, Amos Henry, Economical Geology of Illinois, Illinois State Geological Survey, 1882, 503

Not Enough Sediment in Mississippi to Rebuild Louisiana Wetlands

Fragmenting Wetlands in the Barataria Basin at Port Sulphur, Louisiana

Fragmenting Wetlands in the Barataria Basin at Port Sulphur, Louisiana

The dream that we can make enough freshwater diversions from the Mississippi into the Barataria Basin to the west and Breton Sound to the east to reverse land loss is a fantasy.

A pair of geologists at Louisiana State University issued a report last week, noting that we have deprived the Mississippi River of the sediment necessary to counter the raise in sea level and rebuild the Louisiana coast.

The researchers have concluded that the 8,000 dams we have built in the Mississippi Basin are the culprits. Any sediment that may flow out of the uplands into the tributaries gets trapped behind the dams.

Lock and Dam 26, Alton, Illinois

Lock and Dam 26, Alton, Illinois

We built the 26 dams on the Upper Mississippi to turn it into a profitable navigation channel. All the sediment that comes out of the uplands is trapped behind the dams.  The Corps of Engineers must dredge the navigation channel constantly to maintain its 9-foot depth.

There are six on the Missouri, which flows through soft, erodible sedimentary rocks and supplied the Mississippi with 60% of its sediment before the construction of its dams in the 1950s.

Niobrara River, at Niobrara, Nebraska

Niobrara River, at Niobrara, Nebraska

Take the Niobrara River, which flows to the Missouri at Niobrara, Nebraska.  It heads neat Lusk, Wyoming and flows along the northern margin of the soft, erodible Sand Hills in Nebraska, turns north, and empties into the Missouri.

It is a river that somehow has not been dammed or channelized, but it has still been changed by the construction of the Gavins Point Dam downstream from its confluence with the Missouri. The dam turned the Missouri into a lake and raised the level of the Missouri 2.9 meters at the mouth of the Niobrara.

Note: When a fast moving stream meets a still body of water, it deposits its sediment in the still body of water and forms a delta. That’s what the Niobrara does with the sediment eroded from the Sand Hills when it meets the lake-like Missouri. This is the case with other tributaries of the Missouri. It is all retained behind the Missouri River dams.

Missouri River at Niobrara, Nebraska

Missouri River at Niobrara, Nebraska

Before the construction of the dam, the Missouri carried away all that sediment to the Mississippi, which delivered it to a still body of water: the Gulf of Mexico and built the Louisiana coast.

Now what sediment the Mississippi does carry to the Louisiana Coast does not get to it because we have built levees clear to Venice, Louisiana to prevent the river from flooding and depositing its sediment on the coast. Hence, we have to design freshwater diversions to deliver sediment to the wetlands, which are starving for lack of freshwater and sediment. But, now we are finding those won’t work.[1]


[1] Etheridge, F.G., Skelly, R.L., Bristow, C.S., “Avulsion and Crevassing in the sandy, braided Niobrara River complex response to base-belel rise and aggradation,”  In Fluvial Sedimentology by Norman Dwight Smith and John Rogers, found in Google Books http://books.google.com/books?id=7i_pWcmzRZ4C&pg=PA181&lpg=PA181&dq=Niobrara+Missouri+River&source=bl&ots=94teq3rvPZ&sig=_Ua9y4paapkbENbXSDPBU6r6rhQ&hl=en&ei=pS5KSoq_K4f-NZ-c-fIN&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6.

A Sunday Afternoon at Riverlands

Sunday the heat of the last ten days dissipated and the weather was way too good to stay inside. Off we went to walk the Chain of Rocks Bridge and then to Riverlands, the bird sanctuary behind Lock and Dam 26. We spotted a brown pelican hanging about the fringes of a flock of American White Pelicans, who seem to have given up migrating to Canada in the summer and Louisiana in the winter and decided to stay behind Lock and Dam 26, where the fishing is excellent or has been the last two years because the river is up, the dam is open, and the pool behind the dam low.

The brown pelican, which belongs on a Louisiana bayou, not behind a Mississippi River dam at Alton, Illinois, may be a juvenile white pelican. If so where are the rest of the juveniles in this flock?

Brown Pelican at Riverlands

Brown Pelican at Riverlands

When Congress approved the construction of the new Lock and Dam 26 in 1978, it ordered the Corps of Engineers to mitigate acre for acre the wetlands that would be lost to the new dam. Hence, Riverlands is Congress’s gift to birds and birders.

Mud Flats behind Lock and Dam 26

Mud Flats behind Lock and Dam 26

We have had very little rain in the last ten days and the river is coming down, exposing mud flats on which moist soil vegetation, food for ducks on their fall migration, is sprouting. The Corps of Engineers has been managing Pool 26 for moist soil vegetation for the last fifteen years.

Every May Day the lock masters dropped the water levels of Pools 26, 25, and 24 a mere six inches for thirty days, allowing islands directly north of each dam to dry out and seeds on them to germinate. After thirty days they raised the levels slowly, slowly enough for plants–smartweed, wild millet, chufa, yellow foxtail, pigweed, rice cutgrass, and panicum–to keep their growing tips above water, over two thousand acres of new moist  vegetation–food and protective covering for ducks and filters for nitrogen flowing off corn and soybean fields.

Last year flooding in September drowned out the moist soil vegetation in the pools, leaving the ducks dependent on management wetlands that are protected behind levees.

The Lower Mississippi Watershed Project

When Americans settled in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley in the 18th century, they found 25 million acres of forested wetlands.

First, they cleared small patches for subsistence crops, then more for cotton, and more for rice, and ended up with a fragmented landscape. Wildlife lost habitat.

In the 1960s there was a wholesale clearing of very wet land for soybeans, soybeans only because they were fetching a really good price and they have a very short growing season and can be planted after spring flooding eases. When the price of soybeans fell, these farmers found themselves sitting on very wet land that was not much good for anything but soybeans and trees.

It’s the tree that got Newt Boggs thinking: devise a program where farmers plant trees in vacant land.

Notnac Slough, Tensas Parish, Louisiana

Notnac Slough, Tensas Parish, Louisiana

Mr. Boggs is one of many individuals involved in restoring forested wetlands in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. They get help from the U.S. Forest Service and Ducks Unlimited.

Research has been done in the Yazoo Basin of Mississippi to relearn what we lost when we cleared the forests: what trees grow best where in a landscape that has wet and drier places.

Whites Lake, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana

Whites Lake, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana

Cypress thrive in places like Whites Lake, an old slough running near the Black River in Catahoula Parish. But cypress cannot germinate in water, only in mud. Hence, many years ago Whites Lake dried out enough for these trees to sprout. The oaks–Nuttall, Shumard, overcup– need slightly higher, slightly drier land.

Diverting freshwater from the Mississippi to Bayou Lafourche

Len Bahr at lacoastpost.com has a fantasy: Cut back on the Morganza-to-the-Gulf, which comes with a $11 billion price tag and funnel some of that money to the diversion of freshwater to Bayou Lafourche and all the little bayous that spring from it, beginning with Bayou Terrebonne at Thibodaux. At present the freshwater diversion,which has been in the planning since 1998, comes with $100 million price tag or less.

Bayou Lafourche begin carrying the Mississippi to the Gulf of Mexico 1300 years ago. In time the Mississippi shifted to the modern channel.

Bayou Lafourche at Donaldsonville, Louisiana

Bayou Lafourche at Donaldsonville, Louisiana

In the years following European settlement, Bayou Lafourche flowed from the Mississippi at 5000 cubic feet per second, enough to flood Donaldsonville and the surrounding countryside.

To stop the flooding the bayou was closed at its head at the river in 1903. Within three years the residents of Bush Grove, several miles down on the bayou,  found saltwater in their drinking water, which moved as far upstream as Thibodaux. At the tail end of the bayou saltwater intruded into all the little distributaries that branched off from Lafourche. The wetlands in the Terrebonne and Barataria basins deteriorated even though the Bayou Lafourche Freshwater District restored flow from the Mississippi in 1955.

Diverting freshwater to the coastal marshes in the Terrebonne and Barataria basins first appeared as a concept in the 1993 Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Restoration Plan. The goal of the proposal was to increase the flow of freshwater along Bayou Lafourche to coastal marshes south of Thibodaux–to Lake Fields, Lake Long, Grand Bayou, Bayou Terrebonne, the Houma Navigation Channel, Delta Farms in the Terrebonne basin and Bayou Perot and Bayou Rigolets in the Barataria basin. Its progress to actualization has been rocky.

The EPA and the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources formalized the concept in 1996 and proposed increasing the flow of water in Bayou Lafourche to 2000 cfs, only between January and June when the river would be high enough to make the siphon work. Such a diversion would meet needs of the marshes and the increasing demands for fresh drinking water in the communities along the bayou. The public expressed concern that more water in the bayou would flood them out and erode its banks.

The EPA revised the project, reduced the diversion to 1000 cfs, provided a constant flow year-round with attention to the fall when saltwater intrusion was the greatest, and incorporated channel improvements that addressed flooding and bank stability. The agency presented the revision to the public at four meetings in September 1998. Water levels and bank erosion still concerned the public. In October the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act Task Force–whose members include representatives from the Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the National Resource Conservation Service, the EPA, and the Governor’s Office of Coastal Activities–voted fund $500,000 for the EPA’s initial engineering and design on the project, giving particular attention to engineering bank stability and water levels. And, the agency promised to work closely with the Corps of Engineers.

The following June the EPA listed the work that would be done–analyzing the soils along the bayou to draft its geologic profile, dividing it into reaches based on geologic and topographic similarities, analyzing cross sections for bank stability, coordinating with the U.S. Geological Survey to assess hydraulic data to assure that water flows at safe and acceptable levels while maintaining bank stability.

In June 2000 the EPA concluded that deepening Bayou Lafourche by dredging would increase its carrying capacity and return it to its function as a distributary of freshwater to the marshes without widening its existing channel or eroding its bank. More soil borings needed to be done to assure bank stability at Donaldsonville. And more information needed to be gathered about the design of a new pumping station and the installation of a sediment trap at Donaldsonville, which would hold down dredging costs.

The Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act Task Force approved the first phase of engineering and design. The Task Force with the EPA as the lead agency and the Louisiana DNR would share the $5 million cost of the first phase of engineering and design, at the end of which the work would be thirty percent complete and would then be reviewed.

The engineering and design process considered alternatives to using Bayou Lafourche to deliver Mississippi flows to the wetlands, including a by-pass channel around the most densely populated reach of the bayou that would tap the river at Smoke Bend upstream from Donaldsonville. It evaluated other diversion projects at Caernarvon, Davis Pond, and West Point a la Hache. And, it considered which beneficiaries would pay how much. At the conclusion of the process in May 2006, the engineers choose one of the 144 alternatives they considered for implementation.

Using the existing Bayou Lafourche channel would be the most cost-effective means of diverting freshwater from the Mississippi to the wetlands and the rate of 1000 to 1500 cfs. To do so would entail dredging 2.9 million yards of sediment to deepen the bayou between Donaldsonville and Thibodaux and building a new pump at Donaldsonville. The diversion would raise water levels a foot at Donaldsonville, two and a half feet south of the Thibodaux weir, and a foot at Lockport. The diversion would cost $180 million, half of which would go into dredging. The Technical Committee of Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act Task Force would meet and decide whether the project to go forward. At its July 13, 2006 meeting the Task Force put off its decision to October.

At the October meeting the Task Force engaged in a lively debate about whether to fund the engineering and design of the project to 95% completion at a cost of $5 million. The $180 million cost of the project was outside the CWPRRA’s budget for small projects. The Louisiana DNR feared transferring the project to the Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration Study (LAC) would lead to delay or even cancellation of the project, even through the project was one of five projects included in the LAC Study. If the project were transferred to the Corps of Engineers, funds would have to come out of a Water Resources Development Act. Congress had not passed a WRDA since 2000. The Technical Committee voted not to approve continued funding from CWPRRA and to transfer the diversion project to the LCA for completion.

A month later the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority Integrated Planning Team, set up in December 2005 in the wake of Katrina to develop and implement a comprehensive coastal protection plan, issued its first draft. Listed among the projects was the Bayou Lafourche diversion plan. In February 2007 when the state issued its list of projects that would be funded through the Louisiana Coastal Impact funds, the Louisiana DNR did not include the Bayou Lafourche Diversion among the diversion projects that would receive funding.

In September 2007 Congress passed the long awaited Water Resources Development Act and included the LCA plan in it. President George W. Bush vetoed the act in October. Congress overrode the veto in November.[i]

Read Len Bahr’s fantasy for Bayou Lafourche. It makes sense.


[i] Hallowell, Christopher, Holding Back the Sea, New York: HarperCollins, 2001, 210; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,  “Bayou Lafourche,” Bayou Lafourche Freshwater Diversion Updates, November 1998, June 1999, June 2000, October 25, 2001,

http://www.epa.gov/region6/water/ecopro/em/cwppra/blafourche/index.htm; CH2MHill, Mississippi River Water Reintroduction into Bayou Lafourche: Phase 1 Design Report, Prepared for the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources,  December 2005, Introduction, http://data.lacoast.gov/reports/project/BA-25b/phase_1_section_1.pdf;The Mississippi Re-introduction into Bayou Lafourche, http://www.bayoulafourche.org; Coastal Wetlands Planning , Protection and Restoration Act, Task Force Meeting, October 18, 2006, 83, http://lacoast.gov/reports/tf/tf2006-10-18.pdf; Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority integrated Planning Team, Comprehensive Coastal Protection Master Plan, Appendix A: The Long Term Plan, 107, http://www.louisianacoastalplanning.org/documents/Appendix%20A%20-%20Preliminary%20Draft%20-%20Comprehensive%20Coastal%20Protection%20Master%20Plan%20for%20Louisiana.pdf; Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Draft: Louisiana Coastal Impact Assistance Plan, Executive Summary, http://dnr.louisiana.gov/crm/ciap/executivesummary.2007.02.06.pdf.

It’s June and the Dead Zone

Timbalier Island at the Gulf of Mexico

Timbalier Island at the Gulf of Mexico

Every June the U.S. Geological Survey predicts the size of the Dead Zone in the northern Gulf of Mexico. The Dead Zone is a hypoxic zone in the gulf, the place where levels of oxygen drop so low that it becomes inhospitable to fish and shellfish.

Hypoxia happens naturally every summer, when the Mississippi pours its floods of fresh water into the gulf. The lighter freshwater floats on top of the heavier salt water.  Algae, nourished by nutrients in the fresh water, grow and die and sink to the flour of the gulf, where they decay, soaking up the oxygen. Bottoming-dwelling creatures must leave the Dead Zone or die. Those that can’t do. Fish and shellfish, which breed in coastal wetlands and migrate to the gulf as juveniles, can’t pass through the Dead Zone.

The nutrients, ammonium nitrate or nitrate nitrogen, come from Midwestern corn and soybean fields, from golf courses and carefully tended lawns.

Last year the USGS predicted that the Dead Zone would grow to the size of New Jersey, 8,800 square miles. It didn’t, because Hurricane Dolly mixed in a bit of oxygen and reduced it to 7,889 square miles. The agency attributed its prediction to the size of the corn crop, which was destined for ethanol plants. This year the Dead Zone will be a little smaller.

The National Corn Growers objected this year. They have done research and say that their growers are balancing the corns nutritional needs with the amount of nitrates, which are not washing off their fields and into the rivers.

By the way, before the nitrates even get to the Gulf of Mexico, they are causing problems in the Upper Mississippi, where the “lakes” , the pools, behind the dams suffer from low-oxygen conditions, making it hard on fish.

Cache River Natural Area and Cypress Creek NWR

“Everything around us seemed dreary and dismal, and had we not been endowed with the faculty of deriving pleasure from the examination of nature, we should have made up our minds to pass the time in a state similar to that of Bears during the time of hibernation. We soon found employment, however, for the woods were full of game; and Deer, Turkeys, Raccoons, and Opossums might be seen even around out camp; while on the ice that snow covered the broad stream rested flocks of Swans, to surprise which the hungry Wolves were at times seen to make energetic but unsuccessful efforts. It was curious to see the snow-white birds all lying flat on the ice, but keenly intent on watching the motions of their insidious enemies, until the latter advanced within the distance of a few hundred yards, when the Swans, sounding the trumpet-note of alarm, would all rise, spread out their broad wings, and after running some yards and battering the ice until the noise was echoed like thunder through the woods, rose exultingly into the air, leaving their pursuers to devise other schemes for gratifying their craving appetites.” – John James Audubon[i]

Ice blocking passage through Dogtooth Bend, upstream on the Mississippi from the mouth of the Cache River, forced John James Audubon and his fur-trading party to make camp under a huge tree on Tywapatee Bottom early in the winter of 1810.

Audubon and his party found more than enough game at the mouth of the Cache to sustain themselves until the ice broke up six weeks later. Audubon took the time to study the behavior of trumpeter swans, which also wintered on the ice-covered lakes and ponds near the river. He noted that when trumpeters feed on land, they graze on leaves and seeds and capture land snails and small reptiles. In water they swing their feet in the air, upend their bodies, and thrust their heads deep in water to snag aquatic insects.[ii]

Cache River Wetlands, Big Cypress Access

Cache River Wetlands, Big Cypress Access

The Cache River in southern Illinois flows through an ancient valley carved out by the Ohio River when it carried glacial floods to the Eastern Lowlands. About thirteen thousand years ago, the Ohio shifted south, took over the channel of the Tennessee River, and flowed along the eastern wall of the Mississippi Embayment. The Cache meandered through the abandoned Ohio channel, an underfit stream, too small for its valley.

Historically, the Cache flowed through the five counties that form the southern tip of the State of Illinois.

The Cache River wetlands are a biological and geological crossroads where four physiographic regions overlap: the Ozark Plateau borders the wetlands on the west, the Central Plateau on the north, the Interior Low Plateau on the east, and the Mississippi Embayment, the extension of the Gulf Coastal Plain, on the south. The river itself flows out of the Illinois extension of the Ozark plateau into the Mississippi Embayment.

The region is a mix of habitats: bedrock bluffs, grasslands, and swamp. Upland forests and southern swamps, at the northern edge of their range, support a huge variety of plants and wildlife, including ancient cypress, thousands of years old. Like the larger system of wetlands along the Cache River of Arkansas, the Ramsar Convention designated this Cache River Wetlands a Wetland of International Importance.

Bobcats, coyotes, foxes, and deer roam the upland forests, treed in white oak, red oak, sugar maple, poplar, and shagbark hickory that provide habitat for the Cooper’s Hawk, turkeys, woodcock, and bobtail quail.

Stunted post oak trees and blackjack oak root in the upland barrens, places where the soil is thin and the bedrock exposed.

The floodplain swamps and forests host the greatest variety of trees of any bottomland in Illinois: oak, hickory, cypress, tupelo, sweetgum, ash, maple, and willow. Dense stands of giant cane provide habitat for a diverse population of migratory songbirds. Acadian flycatchers, cerulean warblers, tree swallows, wood ducks, herons, and black vultures find refuge in the cypress-tupelo swamps with their scattering of buttonbush, red maple and Virginia willow.

The Cache River hosts river otters, beaver, muskrats, mink, and raccoons along its banks, and salamanders, snakes, and frogs–bird-voiced tree frogs, southern leopard frogs, spring peepers, western chorus frogs, bullfrogs, and American toads–in its swamps. Lost to the logging and drainage of the wetlands were wolves, bears, and elk, gone since the mid-nineteenth century when sawmills came to the Cache.

Early nineteenth century pioneers to the Cache valley did little to alter the landscape. They supplemented what they could grow on small subsistence farms with hunting and fishing in the swamps. Loggers came to the Cache in 1850 and set up sawmills. The timber industry grew. At the turn of the century as much as two million feet of lumber was being cut from Big Black Slough yearly.

Cache River Wetlands. Heron Pond

Cache River Wetlands. Heron Pond

When farmers began draining the wetlands for fields, they discovered that when the Ohio flooded, so did the Cache. To dry out their land, they chopped the Cache into pieces. In 1916 the Post Creek Cut-off diverted the Upper Cache River near Heron Pond directly to the Ohio River, isolating forty miles of the Lower Cache. The Cache was now two rivers.

After World War II land speculators bought up swampland to drain for farmland. Loggers brought in huge clearing machines to get to the wettest, most remote parts of the swamps. In 1950 a second ditch diverted the Lower Cache to the Mississippi, reducing its length by twenty miles.

In the 1960s and 1970s thousands of acres of prime swampland were cleared and drained for agriculture. Silt poured from the cleared land into the Lower Cache and much as twenty-four inches a year. Ponds dried up. Fish died. Migrating ducks lost prime feeding places where the oak forest had been cleared for cropland.

Lower Cache River

Lower Cache River

In 1979 local citizens, concerned about the isolation and degradation of the Lower Cache formed The Citizens Committee To Save The Cache. They recognized the need to educate the public on the value of the Cache as a natural resource. They petitioned the local drainage district to restore the current to the Cache.

In 1991 the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service established the Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge along a tributary of the Cache. The Service, along with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, The Nature Conservancy, and Ducks Unlimited established the Cache River wetlands Joint Venture Partnership with the intention of restoring the Cache River system as a self-sustaining river-floodplain system by protecting 60,000 acres along a fifty-mile corridor of the Cache and its tributaries and by reconnecting the Upper Cache to the Lower Cache. To this end the partners began working with the Corps of Engineers on a plan for reconnecting the Cache River System and restoring habitat to land accepted in to the Wetlands Reserve Program. At present the group controls 35,000 acres. [iii]


[i] Audubon, Maria R., Audubon and his Journals, New York: Charles Scribner’s Songs, 1897, Vol. II, 222-223; Illinois Trails, “Audubon’s Stay on the Cache,” Exerpt from the book :P ulaski County Illinois” by the Pulaski Board of Commissioners, http://www.iltrails.org/pulaski/Audubon.htm.

[ii] Audubon, John James, Birds of America, Vol. 6, The Trumpeter Swan, http://www.abirdshome.com/Audubon/VolVI/00646.html.

[iii] Saucier, 243; Missouri Department of Conservation, Natural Areas Conference,  #7 Cache River, LaRue-Pine Hills, Otter Pond Research Natural Area, http://www.conservation.state.mo.us/nac/four.htm; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, “Cypress Creek National Wildlife Refuge,” http://refuges.fws.gov/profiles/WildHabitat.cfm?ID=32630; Needham, Rachel, “The Cache River Wetlands,” Illinois Periodicals Online, Northern Illinois University,  http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/ihy020226.html; The Nature Conservancy, “Grassy Slough Preserve at the Cache River Wetlands,” http://nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/illinois/preserves/art1124.html.

New Blog

Before I decided to devote this blog to the Mississippi River and other landscapes, I made several postings on political art.

Iraq Section, Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery

Iraq Section, Jefferson Barracks National Cemetery

Over Memorial Day I returned to the Iraq Section at Arlington National Cemetery, made a series of images, and started thinking about the nature of photography: Is it art or reportage.

Arlington National Cemetery

Arlington National Cemetery

I decided to start a new blog that examines the nature of photography.

You can find it at makegreatphotographs.wordpress.com. Go have a look.

Those of you who have read what I have posted on political art will be interested in seeing it.

Those of you who are interested in photography will also be interested in seeing it.

I am also adding Louis Bickford’s essay on War and Memory. I have added it with his permission.